Two tabs open, two companion apps, two product pages that read like they were written from the same brief. Both promise memory, both promise a voice, both say your conversations are private in roughly the same words. None of it compares, because none of it answers the same question. One block on each page does. AI girlfriend app privacy labels — the App Privacy section on an App Store listing, the Data safety section on a Google Play one — are filled in against a fixed set of prompts, which makes them the only part of a store listing you can read across two apps and get a straight answer. That is worth more than it sounds and less than it looks, and the gap is where first-time buyers get caught.
Why the label is the only part that compares
Everything else on a listing is marketing copy, and marketing copy is written to be incomparable on purpose. One app says "private by design", another says "your data stays yours", and you cannot stack those against each other: they are moods, not claims. The label is different only because the developer did not choose the questions. They filled in a form.
So the habit is narrow: skip the screenshots, scroll to the privacy block, and read the same rows on both listings in the same order. You are not looking for an app that collects nothing — none do, because the memory that makes one worth paying for is stored data by definition. You are looking for the differences between two apps that otherwise look identical.
What an AI girlfriend app privacy label declares
Google's Data safety section covers four areas, set out in its own documentation of the section: what the app collects and whether collection is optional, whether any of it is shared with third parties, a short set of security practices, and whether there is a way to request deletion. Apple's App Privacy block sorts things differently, into data used to track you, data linked to your identity, and data not linked to it — which is a useful cut, because "linked to you" is the part that turns a chat log into a profile.
Two things in the fine print change how you read all of it. First, optional collection is declared as collection, so a row can be true of the app without being true of you: sometimes a label row is a settings screen you have not found yet. Second, "collected" is narrower than the everyday word: Google notes that data processed only in memory, or sent end-to-end encrypted, may not have to be declared as collected at all. A short list is not proof of a quiet app.
The part nobody tells first-time users
The label is a declaration, not an audit. The developer fills in the form and the store publishes it; the accuracy of the entries is not what the review checks. Google says so outright on the page above: the independent security review a developer can declare does not verify the accuracy and completeness of the Data safety disclosure. A row reading "no data shared with third parties" means a person at that company ticked a box.
This is not a reason to ignore labels. A declaration still costs something to make, and a company admitting it shares data with advertisers has told you something real about its business. Treat a label as testimony, not evidence.
You can check one of these claims yourself on an iPhone. Apple's App Privacy Report records how often an app used sensitive permissions and which network domains it contacted, which you can read against what the listing declared. It will not decode what was sent, and a long domain list is normal rather than sinister — but a companion app contacting a dozen advertising domains has made a disclosure of its own.
The deletion row is the one to read twice
If you only read one row before paying, read this one. Google requires apps that offer accounts to provide a way to request data deletion both inside the app and from a web link, and that link is on the listing. Open it while you are still deciding. A page that loads and names what is removed and what is kept is a real answer; a contact form, or a link to a generic privacy policy, is an answer too.
This row matters more than the others because of sequencing. Every other row describes something you can still walk away from; deletion is the one you need after you have handed over months of conversation, when your leverage is gone. We went through the whole sequence in the privacy checks to run before you sign up; the label is simply the fastest way to run the first pass.
A privacy label tells you what a company was willing to put in writing. That is a smaller thing than the truth, and a larger thing than a slogan.
Running the side-by-side
Here is the pass, in the order that makes two listings sort themselves. About ten minutes for a pair of apps, all of it before you install anything.
- Tracking first. Is there a "Data used to track you" block on the App Store listing, and what is in it? Tracking is the row most at odds with what you are paying for.
- Linked versus not linked. Of what is collected, how much is tied to your identity? Two apps can collect the same categories and differ entirely here.
- Sharing. Does anything go to third parties, and is the category named? "Shared" and "collected" are separate rows for a reason.
- Optional collection. Which rows are marked optional? Each is a setting to find on day one rather than a reason to rule the app out.
- The deletion link. Open it. Read what it promises. This is the row that decides it.
- Last updated. A privacy block that predates a major feature release is describing a different app.
Do the same six on whatever you are leaning towards, including the app we currently recommend, Our method for running a fair comparison test works on the same principle: fixed questions, asked identically, so the answers stack.
The trade-off, honestly
Two things cut against all of this. The first: signing up on the web gets you no label at all. Store listings carry privacy blocks; a website carries a privacy policy, which is longer, less structured and comparable to nothing. That is a genuine argument for installing from a store even when the web signup is cheaper, and it cuts against our piece on where to sign up, which favours the web for other reasons. Both are true; pick the one you care about more.
The second is proportion. A label tells you about data handling and nothing about whether the conversation is any good, whether the memory holds for more than a week, or whether the subscription renews at a price you agreed to. Those decide whether an app is worth paying for; the label only decides whether it is worth trusting with what you type. Use it to break a tie, not to replace the trial.
Frequently asked questions
Are app store privacy labels accurate?
They are accurate to the extent the developer filled the form in honestly. Google states that the independent security review does not verify the accuracy and completeness of a Data safety disclosure, so a label is a declaration rather than an audit. It is still useful: an app that admits to an awkward practice has told you something a marketing page never would.
Do AI girlfriend apps have privacy labels if I sign up on the web?
No. The App Privacy and Data safety blocks exist on store listings only, so a web signup leaves you with the company's privacy policy instead. If you want the structured version, look up the app's store listing even when you intend to pay on the web.
What should I check on a companion app's privacy label before paying?
Start with whether anything is used to track you, then how much of what is collected is linked to your identity, then whether data is shared with third parties. Then open the deletion link on the listing and read what it promises, before any money moves.
Disclosure. NaughtySignal may earn a commission if you sign up through a Visit link on this page, at no cost to you. It does not change what we write. How we earn.